Read all Latest Updates on and about Justice Ahsanuddin Amaah.

SC Invokes Powers Under Article 142 While Directing State To Pay Rs 3 Lakhs To Party Due To Inordinate Delay In Adjudicatory Process

Verdictum News Desk13 Oct 2023 2:15 PM GMT

A Supreme Court Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah has exercised powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to...

You Searched For "Justice Ahsanuddin Amaah."

SC Invokes Powers Under Article 142 While Directing State To Pay Rs 3 Lakhs To Party Due To Inordinate Delay In Adjudicatory Process

Court Ought Not To Have Considered Delay Of 459 Days Without Satisfactory Explanation: SC While Allowing Appeal Of Karnataka State Electronics Corp

You Are Married With Kids, Why Did You Get Into Relationship: SC Asks While Dismissing Anticipatory Bail Application Of Doctor Accused Of Rape On False Promise Of Marriage

IBC| OTS Proposals By Corporate Debtor Not Questioned By Suspended Directors- SC Dismisses Appeal Of Axis Bank, Upholds Condonation Of Delay By SBI In CIRP

SpiceJet-Credit Suisse Case: "We Will Send You To Tihar Jail If You Don't Pay": SC Warns SpiceJet Chairman Over Non-Payment Of Dues

Burden On Accused Kicks In When Last Seen Theory Is Established: Supreme Court While Acquitting Murder Convict

Being A Recognized State Party, Request For Allotment Of Plough Symbol By J&K National Conference Was Legitimate & Bonafide: Supreme Court

SC Enhances War Widow’s Compensation From ₹50,000 To ₹5 Lacs In A Closed Matter Considering 15 Years’ Delay

Respondent's Application U/s. 438 CrPC Should Not Have Been Entertained As He Was A Proclaimed Offender: SC Sets Aside High Court's Order Granting Anticipatory Bail

Witness Can Be Recalled For Further Examination In Order To Avoid Mistake Of Either Party In Bringing Valuable Evidence On Record: Reiterates SC

Once Power Of Attorney Is Found To Be Invalid, Any Further Action Taken Pursuant To It Can’t Be Held As Valid: SC

"Explanation" In Order XVII Rule 2 CPC Doesn't Apply To Parties Without Substantial Evidence: Supreme Court