CLOSE
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Calcutta High Court
    • Chhattisgarh High Court
    • Andhra Pradesh High Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Jharkhand High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Orissa High Court
    • Patna High Court
    • Rajsthan High Court
    • Telangana high Court
    • Gauhati High Court
    • Himachal High Court
    • Manipur High Court
    • Meghalaya High Court
    • Punjab & Haryana High Court
    • Sikkim High Court
    • Tripura High Court
    • Uttarakhand High Court
    • Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court
  • News
  • TOP STORIES
  • Videos
  • Job Updates
  • Columns
  • Weekly Summary
  • Find Lawyer
Verdictum
Verdictum
Verdictum
  • Home
  • Latest Updates
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Calcutta High Court
    • Chhattisgarh High Court
    • Andhra Pradesh High Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Jharkhand High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Orissa High Court
    • Patna High Court
    • Rajsthan High Court
    • Telangana high Court
    • Gauhati High Court
    • Himachal High Court
    • Manipur High Court
    • Meghalaya High Court
    • Punjab & Haryana High Court
    • Sikkim High Court
    • Tripura High Court
    • Uttarakhand High Court
    • Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court
  • News
  • TOP STORIES
  • Videos
  • Job Updates
  • Columns
  • Weekly Summary
  • Find Lawyer
  • Home
  •  / 
  • Reverse Burden of Proof

Reverse Burden of Proof

Defendant Pleading Gratuitous Payment In A Suit For Recovery Has To Prove The Same: Supreme Court
Supreme Court

Defendant Pleading Gratuitous Payment In A Suit For Recovery Has To Prove The Same: Supreme Court

Verdictum News Desk25 Dec 2021 11:41 AM IST

A Supreme Court Bench consisting of Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice V. Ramasubramanian has ruled that in a suit for recovery of money, a defendant...

Presumption Under Section 69 Of Kerala Forest Act Is Regarding Deemed Ownership Of Seized Articles And Not Mens Rea Of Accused: Supreme Court
Supreme Court

Presumption Under Section 69 Of Kerala Forest Act Is Regarding Deemed Ownership Of Seized Articles...

Gurpreet Kaur8 Oct 2021 1:07 PM IST

A two-judge Bench of Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice S. Ravindra Bhat has held that for the operation of Section 69 of the Kerala Forest Act to...

Verdictum

© Copyright 2022, All rights reserved.

Powered by Hocalwire

X