< Back
Individual Freedom Of Conscience Can't Defeat Freedom Of Denomination: Devotees Submit After Apex Court Highlighted "Eclipsing" Of Rights Of Non-Believer
9 April 2026 5:30 PM IST
"Professors Who Have Nothing To Do With Indian Society Have Occupied So Much Space": CJI's Reaction To Apex Court Relying On Nivedita Menon's Articles
9 April 2026 1:22 PM IST
Can Court Entertain Plea By A Non-Devotee? : Supreme Court Questions Locus Standi Of Petitioners In Sabarimala PILs
8 April 2026 5:30 PM IST
Sabarimala Reference|Secular Courts Are Scholars Of Law, Can't Decide Religious Practices Due To Lack Of Scholarly Competence: SG Tushar Mehta Concludes Its Arguments
8 April 2026 5:00 PM IST
Not A Valid Ground For Judicial Review: Centre Attacks Doctrine Of Constitutional Morality, Calls It 'Vague Concept' Capable Of Elastic Interpretation
8 April 2026 4:30 PM IST
Sabarimala Review| Judgment Was Wrongly Decided & Deserves To Be Declared Wrong In Law: Centre Argues Denominational Autonomy Can't Be Tested On Touchstone Of Individual Dignity
7 April 2026 4:30 PM IST
Entry Ban Not Absolute Restriction, Preserves Deity's Celibate Character: Akhil Bhartiya Sant Samiti To Supreme Court In Sabarimala Case
2 April 2026 10:00 AM IST
Courts Must Not Attempt To Judicially Determine Nature Of Religious Practices: Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court In Sabarimala Review Case
28 March 2026 4:00 PM IST
Court Bound To Accept Religious Belief Of Community, Not To Sit In Judgment On It: Travancore Devaswom Board Tells Supreme Court In Sabarimala Case
24 March 2026 7:00 PM IST
Person Not Belonging To Religion Cannot Normally Question Practice Of That Religion By Filing PIL: Kerala Submits In Sabarimala Case
24 March 2026 6:00 PM IST
Consultation With Religious Scholars Must Precede Judicial Review Of Religious Practices: Kerala Tells Supreme Court In Sabarimala Case
24 March 2026 5:30 PM IST
Breaking| Supreme Court's Nine Judges Bench To Hear Review Of 2018 Sabarimala Judgment From April 7
18 Feb 2026 4:40 PM IST
Next >
X