Karnataka HC Issues Notice On A Plea Challenging Internal Reservations Among SCs Recommended By Outgoing BJP Govt

Update: 2023-05-21 06:30 GMT

The internal reservations recommended by the outgoing Government in Karnataka have been challenged in a public interest litigation filed before the High Court.

A single-judge vacation bench of Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde, which heard the petition, ordered issuing of notices to the Chief Secretary and the Social Welfare Department and adjourned the hearing to May 24.

The PIL was filed by H Ravi, a resident of Bengaluru and president of 'Meesalathi Samrakshana Ookutha'. It claimed that a Cabinet sub-committee chaired by the outgoing Law Minister J C Madhuswamy had categorized the 101 Scheduled Castes into four groups and distributed the 17 percent reservation for SCs among these four groups.

Counsel Nabeel appeared for the Petitioner before the High Court.

The order available on the High Court's website reads, "Learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Respondents. List this matter on 24.05.2023."

The sub-committee's recommendation was accepted by the Cabinet on March 27, 2023, chaired by outgoing Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai. The same, after approval by the Governor, would be sent to the President for necessary Constitutional amendment, the PIL said.

"The copy of the report of the Cabinet sub-committee is also not available in the public domain and therefore the petitioner is not able to produce the same before this Hon'ble Court," the petition says.

The recommendation by the sub-committee has four castes Adi Dravida, Bhambi, Madiga, Samagara in Group 1 with 6 per cent reservation. Group 2 with castes Adi Karnataka, Chalavadi, Channadasara, Holeya and Mahar has 5.5 per cent reservation. Group 3 has Banjara, Bhovi, Koracha, Korma and four other castes with 4.5 per cent reservation. Group 4 has the remaining castes with 1 per cent reservation.

The PIL has alleged that the new break-up of the reservation among the various categories of SCs "is manifestly arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as it is recommended for the classification of the 101 Schedule Castes into 4 groups irrationally, unscientifically and without having adequate determining principles."

Cause Title: Sri H Ravi v. The State of Karnataka [WP No. 10184/2023]

Click here to read/download the Order




With PTI Inputs

Tags:    

Similar News